Topic Modeling Reflection

Uncategorized
Kai Colorado I analyzed a corpus consisting of three sets of council transcriptions from meetings between Native American tribes, Europeans, and Euro-Americans. In Mallet, I generated fifteen (15) topics across the corpus of 292 documents. On the first iteration of the process, I attempted to generate ten (10) topics, but the weight each topic was the same. The majority of the 15 discernable topics were pertinent to the relations between parties or the organization of such. For example, the topic that I labeled “Boundaries” included the words “treaty, line, lands, boundary, river, etc.” The distinctions between indigenous topics and Eurocentric topics are also visible across the key terms. The category “European Officials” houses words such as, “general, commissioners, agent, government” and other words associated with Eurocentric standards of national organization.…
Read More
Power Dynamics Across Nations

Power Dynamics Across Nations

Perspectives, Uncategorized
            The process of successful negotiation is one that requires fluid communication and mutual understanding between parties. It is one that calls for give and take from all those involved. In the case of the negotiations between indigenous leaders, cross-cultural boundaries of language and negotiating standards hindered the fluidity of treatymaking and created misunderstanding between parties. Generally benefitting Europeans, these failures in communication created treaties and relationships that were perceived differently between the two groups. The skewed perceptions of these relationships built upon established disparities in power and societal constructs across cultures and further disadvantaged Native American tribes during the process of European immigration. Analyzing council transcripts of negotiations between Europeans and indigenous people sheds light on each party’s motives and perceptions of the other.             The council minutes I…
Read More